Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    20

    Fischer Big Stix FX 8.6 Review??

    Anyone been on these? Last year I had a pair of Blizzard Titans, but I want something slightly wider.

    I don't want to give up the hard snow capability that the titans had though.

    Any thoughts? Thanks

    AR

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mammoth Lakes
    Posts
    3,646
    Bump, because I'm looking for some info on this ski.
    He who has the most fun wins!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Under your Moustaasch.
    Posts
    380
    they were quite praised in few skandinavian skimags.
    erm..quickly like this..

    -very light.
    -not so stiff flex, but torsionally very rigid.
    -quite stable for a light ski, not an explosive though.
    -elan mantis 777 like.same feel that atomics have, but more "snap".
    -suprisingly good edge hold.
    -quick skis in short,falline type turns, yet likes to carve large arcs.
    -handles speed very well.
    -ugly.
    -erm.
    -this had to be the most uninformative reviev ever.
    I have never been good with facts.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Hunter Thompson described it as hell.
    Posts
    2,642
    http://tetongravity.com/forums/showt...&threadid=1262

    Like Spam said, real light but still able to really set an edge, easy underfoot, quick but you can lay out big super-g turns too. Oh, I don't think they are ugly kinda dug the black topsheet and the the snub-nose tip.
    Skiing, where my mind is even if my body isn't.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mammoth Lakes
    Posts
    3,646
    How about compared to the R-EX?

    I'm infering from what has been written, possibly a little softer longitudinally? Still pretty torsionally stiff? Was the tip as stiff as the R-EX?

    Caddy, what size did you try and how big an hombre are you?

    By the way, you suck for grabbin those Soli Race GS's from Aquaswalik (or what ever his screen name is).

    Thanks
    He who has the most fun wins!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,037
    I remember looking into these as a lightweight touring option since they had a cabon fiber construction. Turns out these things are anything but lightweight. Their lighter than previous models, but are still tanks, especially for their small size.

    4.3 kg per 180cm, vs. an atomic rex which is similar in dimensions, but only 3.6kg.

    but if you're not trekking uphill with them, who the hell cares
    Last edited by cmor; 12-20-2003 at 04:53 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •