Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26

Thread: BD Poles/whippet compatibility

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Wilson, Wyo.
    Posts
    4,837

    BD Poles/whippet compatibility

    I'm interested in getting a Whippet (ice axe, not dog) for certain situations where i don't want to carry a full axe, and I realize that means I have to get BD poles.

    Question: Are the BD carbon poles compatible with the Whippets? A buddy suggested they are not, but he doesn't know for sure. He has the carbons and felt that there is a big difference in swing weight with the aluminums, so I'd prefer to go carbon if i can.

    Has anyone used both? Any durability issues with their carbon poles? I did a quick check, and it actually looks like the BD carbon FLickLocks are cheaper than the aluminum ones (odd).

    I've been a long-time LifeLink carbon pole user...and I always loved the adjustability (for skinning/changing pole length depending on the terrain) & low swing weight...but as any LL user knows, there are times when the poles stick and times when they suddenly "shorten". I take good care of my poles, service them, etc... but in certain environments (e.g., Denali) this happened more than others.

    I have to confess that the BD FlickLock method for adjustment always seemed more bomber, so while I'm not excited about having to shell out $$ for new poles, it would be cool to get an improvement somewhere.

    Thanks for any help!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    8,881
    The whippets now sold with bottom shaft, i.e, as a whole pole. Buy two.
    Elvis has left the building

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Wilson, Wyo.
    Posts
    4,837
    Really? I was thinking of just buying one (didn't know if it'd ever really need 2) for saving the cost.

    This would be, what, about $160 for a pair of whippets/full pole?

    Are they carbon or aluminum lower?

    Thanks!

    I guess if it's sold as the whole pole, I could just use that pole with one of my LL's when I need it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    HELLsinki, Finland
    Posts
    3,683
    Atleast BD used to sell and whippet-upper-to-carbon-lower -adapter at bdel.com, so I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that yer friend got it wrong. As for the locking mechanism, well I use Grippon-poles that have the same system as BD (Flicklock) and have used numerous Leki-poles (the twist for locking-thing, I assume the LL has the same system) and those have always sucked (atleast after they were "broken in").
    Quote Originally Posted by RootSkier
    You should post naked pictures of this godless heathen.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Near Perimetr.
    Posts
    3,857
    BD have apparently two different "carbon" poles.

    One is with the a aluminium upper part, one is completely of carbonfibre.

    I stupidly bought the alu+carbon as i tought it was the fullcarbon version...
    The japanese texts might have confused me abit, and the fact that i got them for about 35€s...

    But, at least the alu+carbon versions should be replable with the whippet.
    I saw them selling separately, and in the confusing "manual" that came with the poles, there was a illustration to put the whippet in the pole.

    For the fliplock i have nothing but good things to say.
    Have had it in few poles and it is bomber.
    My experiences with the "screw" thightening systems have allways been miserable,so i think you will like the fliplocks if you end up getting them.

    And most of all, i find the BDs very good to ski with. Nice swing. Way better than my older 3 piece Giprons (wich manufactures BD and other brands in their factory) wich were compressible but a bit too heavy.

    Just my .02 cents.

    The floggings will continue until morale improves.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sandy
    Posts
    5,374
    BD used to only sell the whippet upper. In the last year or so they switched to selling the whippet as a complete pole. (upper+lower). I ended up having to buy a set of 2 piece flick locks+the whippet pole. Dunno about buying 2, I think it would get too dangerous/confusing in a fall to have 2, esp if your used to self arresting with an ice axe. But, as it's not a full on ice axe 2 whippets would probably be better from a stopping standpoint. I noticed Coombs and company were using 2 whippets on the otterbody, but I would take the risk of a pick to the chest vs. the fall anyday in that situation...
    When life gives you haters, make haterade.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sandy Eggo
    Posts
    1,182
    I ski with two.

    I have the 'whippet trek' uppers (ie, short, meant for three section poles) with the normal (two section pole) lowers. Greatly enhances the swing weight.

    Whippets work great for skinning because you can put your hand on the pick to push, giving you several additional inches.

    Two are also nice for climbing.

    I've never impaled myself in 2+ years of skiing with them, and it's not for lack of falls. Just keep the whippet pointed away from yer body.



    They are also THE SHIT for scratching your head on a hot, sweaty day.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Closed Area
    Posts
    1,188
    you might want to check out the Grivel Condor self-arrest grip attachment

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,027
    grivel might have what you are looking for:

    http://www.grivel.com/Products/Detta...ozze.asp?ID=23
    http://www.grivel.com/Products/Detta...ozze.asp?ID=24

    don't ask me what the difference is between the 2. nor do i have any experience with them.

    edit: I guess I'm a really slow poster.
    Last edited by greg; 04-21-2006 at 12:53 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    8,881
    Quote Originally Posted by sfotex
    I think it would get too dangerous/confusing in a fall to have 2, esp if your used to self arresting with an ice axe
    if you are skiing where you need a whippet, putting the pick in quick is important. If you are worried about sticking yourself, buy some of these

    Nice to have even if you aren't, I've poked more than one whole in stuff with shrap points floating around car/appartment.
    Elvis has left the building

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sandy
    Posts
    5,374
    Quote Originally Posted by cj001f
    if you are skiing where you need a whippet, putting the pick in quick is important. If you are worried about sticking yourself, buy some of these
    Nice to have even if you aren't, I've poked more than one whole in stuff with shrap points floating around car/appartment.
    I ski with one whippet, but that's just b/c I think with two I think I would drop the left one and focus on getting the right one planted with all my body weight (alpine ice axe reaction) , but again that's just me. I could see for some people it would be more natural to be able to use both hands.
    When life gives you haters, make haterade.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Juancisco
    Posts
    812
    Whip it?


  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ootarded
    Posts
    4,089
    I have both a Grivel Condor and a BDEL Whippet, and use them both. The Condor if anything steep might possibly be encountered, and the Whippet + Condor if I know the objective requires it. The Whippet is marginally better for self-arrest, though I wouldn't count on it if I was sliding much faster than walking speed. Practicing self-arrest with this slightly different setup and anticipating are important, as always - as you well know, the window between sliding for life and stopping yourself is pretty damn small, even with an ice axe.

    The Condor is like the old Ramer, is more comfortable than the Whippet, and can occasionally be useful when the Whippet isn't. One in each hand and crampons on your feet and you're a hard-steep-snow couloir climbing maniac. I'll sometimes still bring an ice axe, though less and less often these days - Andrew McLean doesn't even bother with an ice axe most of the time and just goes with the Whippet-in-each-hand (though he's kinda biased, having invented the things). Swing weight on either Whippet or Condor is heavy but you get used to it quickly. I have fallen on my Whippet once soon after I first got it, and it hurt, but didn't cause major damage.

    To address the original question, as others have mentioned, BD used to have an adaptor for the carbon-fiber lowers, but uncertain if this holds for the most recent batch. I imagine it does, though.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Alco-Hall of Fame
    Posts
    2,997
    UAN- I was gonna suggest the condor also but got beat to the punch.

    It's been occasionally derided here but I just picked up a LL Claw b/c I for one really dislike BD poles and really like my LL ones. Clearly it isn't an ice axe replacement but it seems solid enough for its intended purpose. Plus it doesn't change the weight hardly at all. Inexpensive too. (haven't used it yet though).

    "It is not the result that counts! It is not the result but the spirit! Not what - but how. Not what has been attained - but at what price.
    - A. Solzhenitsyn

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Wilson, Wyo.
    Posts
    4,837
    Thank you, all, for the good info.

    It seems that:
    1) The Whippet is now available as a full pole (though I assume but am not certain that this is an aluminum lower);
    2) The Claw is an option for LL users, although it may lack one appealing feature for me, namely...
    3) The Whippet pick is removable in the field. This seems cool as it is something I could leave in my pack and only attach wehn needed (e.g., when the climb or descent is hairy).
    4) An adaptor is available for carbon fiber BD lowers. Hoever, this means that one would need to buy 1 or 2 whippets, plus a set of adaptors, plus a set of BD carbon poles. This is a pretty significant investment. Perhaps BD would sell the carbon lowers, only. Hm.

    Decisions, decisions!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    702
    Quote Originally Posted by upallnight
    Thank you, all, for the good info.

    It seems that:
    1) The Whippet is now available as a full pole (though I assume but am not certain that this is an aluminum lower);
    2) The Claw is an option for LL users, although it may lack one appealing feature for me, namely...
    3) The Whippet pick is removable in the field. This seems cool as it is something I could leave in my pack and only attach wehn needed (e.g., when the climb or descent is hairy).
    4) An adaptor is available for carbon fiber BD lowers. Hoever, this means that one would need to buy 1 or 2 whippets, plus a set of adaptors, plus a set of BD carbon poles. This is a pretty significant investment. Perhaps BD would sell the carbon lowers, only. Hm.

    Decisions, decisions!

    http://www.bdel.com/gear/spare_parts_snow.php

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    38
    the BD pole selection and naming conventions are confusing at best - i would recommend calling them if possible and explaining what you want to do.

    for example, there are two different types of carbon-fiber poles - with different diameter carbon-fiber bottom sections. The carbon-fiber adapter piece is meant only for mating the skinny carbon fiber bottoms with the older (whippet-compatible) uppers.

    having tried this myself in the past - i didn't have great luck with these adapters. they give a snug fit at the flicklock, but I found that if you had much of the lower nested inside the upper (ie. using the poles short), that they would rattle around inside there and it was very annoying.

    if you really want to use the whippet - my advice would be to go with a set of old-style all-alu poles for use with the whippet, and keep a lighter carbon-fiber pair for all your other uses.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Wilson, Wyo.
    Posts
    4,837
    Quote Originally Posted by Schnappi
    Nice....they do sell the carbon lowers for $15. Not bad. Now, I just have to figure out if they'll still sell the whippet upper only.

    Probably looking at $160 for 2 full whippets + 2 adaptors + $30 for the carbon lowers = yikes!

    If they can sell the whippet upper only, that could save some $$ (offset by buying BD baskets).

    Thanks for the info. This might take a call to BD next week.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Wilson, Wyo.
    Posts
    4,837
    Quote Originally Posted by soul_skier
    i have a one whippet, and for things like boot-packing up tuckermans where it can be sketchy as hell, i love it, i have fallen on it, just hurt like a sob, didn't puncture anything
    Well, page 5 of the Whippet user guide clearly states:

    "When climbing or hiking with the pick attached, try to avoid selfevisceration
    should you wipe out."

    Who wrote that?????

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Wilson, Wyo.
    Posts
    4,837
    Quote Originally Posted by doctapow
    having tried this myself in the past - i didn't have great luck with these adapters. they give a snug fit at the flicklock, but I found that if you had much of the lower nested inside the upper (ie. using the poles short), that they would rattle around inside there and it was very annoying.

    if you really want to use the whippet - my advice would be to go with a set of old-style all-alu poles for use with the whippet, and keep a lighter carbon-fiber pair for all your other uses.
    good advice- now that is really helpful. i was hoping that the whippet + carbon lower combo could be an everyday thing (leaving the picks in my pack until necessary), but maybe that is not the best idea.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    London : the L is for Value!
    Posts
    4,574
    @hemas : I don't know why I keep buying Leki polls, everyone has sucked Nothing makes you confident like a collapsing pole on a jump turn...

    I was hopeful for the Leki Extreme (only one twist lock system) and I've had to repair it twice, and my right-hand pole is forever loosening. Drives me wild.

    edg
    Do you realize that you've just posted an admission of ignorance so breathtaking that it disqualifies you from commenting on any political or economic threads from here on out?

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Wilson, Wyo.
    Posts
    4,837
    I'm under the impression that the BD system works the best....my LL's are OK but far from perfect (more often freezing up and refusing to adjust, rather than outright collapsing).

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    London : the L is for Value!
    Posts
    4,574
    I wish I had gone for a Flicklock system. Maybe next season, if I have any money left over

    edg
    Do you realize that you've just posted an admission of ignorance so breathtaking that it disqualifies you from commenting on any political or economic threads from here on out?

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    HELLsinki, Finland
    Posts
    3,683
    Quote Originally Posted by edg
    I wish I had gone for a Flicklock system. Maybe next season, if I have any money left over

    edg
    Well I bought my Giprons for 15 €, what's that like 3 beers at the pub...
    Quote Originally Posted by RootSkier
    You should post naked pictures of this godless heathen.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    London : the L is for Value!
    Posts
    4,574
    Quote Originally Posted by hemas
    Well I bought my Giprons for 15 €, what's that like 3 beers at the pub...
    Oh, good call. But 3 whole beers

    edg
    Do you realize that you've just posted an admission of ignorance so breathtaking that it disqualifies you from commenting on any political or economic threads from here on out?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •