Check Out Our Shop
Page 589 of 602 FirstFirst ... 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 ... LastLast
Results 14,701 to 14,725 of 15040
  1. #14701
    Join Date
    Oct 2022
    Posts
    133
    I was on J118s at Meadows today and had perhaps the best ski day of the season. When the snow's deep J118s are IT. Skied steep trees, hucked my meat off shit, and blasted through and over chop all day long. 10/10 ski for storm skiing in the PNW.

  2. #14702
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,134
    After skiing the 186 BGs today thought it was worth sharing for everyone here.

    Current (23/24, 24/25) 186 BG is closer to the olde 189 (which was based off the 191) than the older 184/186. The 191 is based off the Super Goat with how the ski balances, but generally a bit toned down

  3. #14703
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,603
    Quote Originally Posted by XavierD View Post
    After skiing the 186 BGs today thought it was worth sharing for everyone here.

    Current (23/24, 24/25) 186 BG is closer to the olde 189 (which was based off the 191) than the older 184/186. The 191 is based off the Super Goat with how the ski balances, but generally a bit toned down
    Hmm, can you elaborate? I'm not sure I understand the differences between the model iterations you mention, but I've only skied the 12/13-13/14 191 and then the 2022/2023 187 BG 118 Tour. And also a single run on the WROD with adrenelated's asyms.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  4. #14704
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1,433
    Looks like the jeff108 has less effective edge than the 118. Does the 118 have significantly more rocker than the 108?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. #14705
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,134
    Quote Originally Posted by auvgeek View Post
    Hmm, can you elaborate? I'm not sure I understand the differences between the model iterations you mention, but I've only skied the 12/13-13/14 191 and then the 2022/2023 187 BG 118 Tour. And also a single run on the WROD with adrenelated's asyms.
    12/13 191 basically became a 189 around 2015 or so, largely to get it under the scary 190 number so people would buy it. This was done by basically cutting 2cm of twin tip off. 186 became a 184 around the same time, and the 193 Supergoat was produced too in that timeline. The 189 and 184 later got the asym treatment around 2017.

    187 and 192 were largely new BGs rather than a subtle tweak of the previous one, but still combined elements of multiple previous generations. 187 kinda sat between the old 184/6 and older 189/191. 192 sat closer to the supergoat than the 191 BG.

    186 and 191 took what was going on with the 187 and 192 and brought back more of the 2012-2016 era goat aspects. Part of this was moving the mount point back relative to certain aspects of the side cut, and tweaking the tail a bit. End result is how the current 186 ski balances feels more like the 12-16 191/189 than the 12-16 186/184.

  6. #14706
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    662
    Quote Originally Posted by PeachesNCream View Post
    Looks like the jeff108 has less effective edge than the 118. Does the 118 have significantly more rocker than the 108?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I'm assuming you mean the 108 has more EE than the 118. I believe the reduction in EE comes from more taper in the 118 I don't think is has much more rocker if at all. I could also be completely wrong on this!

  7. #14707
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1,433
    Quote Originally Posted by K1mJ0ngTr1ll View Post
    I'm assuming you mean the 108 has more EE than the 118. I believe the reduction in EE comes from more taper in the 118 I don't think is has much more rocker if at all. I could also be completely wrong on this!
    Yes, that’s what I meant. Ah interesting


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #14708
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    11,029
    Quote Originally Posted by XavierD View Post
    12/13 191 basically became a 189 around 2015 or so, largely to get it under the scary 190 number so people would buy it. This was done by basically cutting 2cm of twin tip off. 186 became a 184 around the same time, and the 193 Supergoat was produced too in that timeline. The 189 and 184 later got the asym treatment around 2017.

    187 and 192 were largely new BGs rather than a subtle tweak of the previous one, but still combined elements of multiple previous generations. 187 kinda sat between the old 184/6 and older 189/191. 192 sat closer to the supergoat than the 191 BG.

    186 and 191 took what was going on with the 187 and 192 and brought back more of the 2012-2016 era goat aspects. Part of this was moving the mount point back relative to certain aspects of the side cut, and tweaking the tail a bit. End result is how the current 186 ski balances feels more like the 12-16 191/189 than the 12-16 186/184.
    Dam, how does one accumulate such knowledge?

    Impressive.

    Some OG 2012 191 BG stoke from last night in chop.


  9. #14709
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ColoRADo
    Posts
    5,946
    I may have too many skis at 118 waist or wider…please keep snowing.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4345.JPG 
Views:	117 
Size:	365.5 KB 
ID:	488498



    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    You should have been here yesterday!

  10. #14710
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    18,633
    New goats looking good.
    watch out for snakes

  11. #14711
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,134
    Quote Originally Posted by SB View Post
    New goats looking good.
    Ski good too

  12. #14712
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,458
    Posted my Gen 1 177 Woods 108s in GS in case anyone is looking. Great ski ... just the 182 110 works better for me and I no longer want to hold this set as a spare.
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  13. #14713
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,236
    Quote Originally Posted by PowTron View Post
    I may have too many skis at 118 waist or wider…please keep snowing.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4345.JPG 
Views:	117 
Size:	365.5 KB 
ID:	488498



    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    And I thought I had a problem...

  14. #14714
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ColoRADo
    Posts
    5,946
    Quote Originally Posted by SB View Post
    New goats looking good.
    They are my favorite version since the Bearclaw 191. Easily.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    You should have been here yesterday!

  15. #14715
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,943
    Quote Originally Posted by PowTron View Post
    They are my favorite version since the Bearclaw 191. Easily.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Tell us more please.

    Are you on the 186 or 191?

  16. #14716
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    3,788
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    Tell us more please.

    Are you on the 186 or 191?
    Cosign on this ask. Would love a deeper comparison to the bearclaw.

  17. #14717
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,036
    As someone who loves the bearclaw version, but didn't really mesh with the asym 189s, I'm also curious. I could drive the 191 bearclaws. If I tried to do that with the asyms they would just wash out at the end of every turn.

  18. #14718
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,199
    So, IIRC, the "Bear Claw" was the 2013 model. Only the 191 had RES. (See photo below). They absolutely charge in the 191 length.

    Starting in 2014 to 2017, all model lengths had RES, with various tweaks to the tail. Asym came in 2018. I still have a pair of 189's. I personally think the Asym 189 is more demanding than the 2013-2017 191, but YMMV.

    It's trivial, but unless a person had the 2013 191, they didn't ski the mythical "Bear Claw" BG.

    Name:  Bear Claw 2013 BG.jpg
Views: 497
Size:  91.3 KB
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  19. #14719
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    So, IIRC, the "Bear Claw" was the 2013 model. Only the 191 had RES. (See photo below). They absolutely charge in the 191 length.

    Starting in 2014 to 2017, all model lengths had RES, with various tweaks to the tail. Asym came in 2018. I still have a pair of 189's. I personally think the Asym 189 is more demanding than the 2013-2017 191, but YMMV.

    It's trivial, but unless a person had the 2013 191, they didn't ski the mythical "Bear Claw" BG.

    Name:  Bear Claw 2013 BG.jpg
Views: 497
Size:  91.3 KB
    Not quite true, Mr Bandit, AFAIK.

    2011/2012 was the first BG to include RES, but only in the 191cm length.

    2012/2013 had a refined RES and in all lengths. That's the bearclaw/manpaw graphic. 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 were the same build. I think 15/16, too, except that's when the 2cm of tail was whacked to make the lineup 189/184/179/174/164.

    2016/2017 saw a change to the sidecut to include short straight sections and I think they got a little stiffer. Starting to depart from the magickz.

    2017/2018 introduced asymmetrical taper to tips and tails.

  20. #14720
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,327
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    So, IIRC, the "Bear Claw" was the 2013 model. Only the 191 had RES. (See photo below). They absolutely charge in the 191 length.

    Starting in 2014 to 2017, all model lengths had RES, with various tweaks to the tail. Asym came in 2018. I still have a pair of 189's. I personally think the Asym 189 is more demanding than the 2013-2017 191, but YMMV.

    It's trivial, but unless a person had the 2013 191, they didn't ski the mythical "Bear Claw" BG.

    Name:  Bear Claw 2013 BG.jpg
Views: 497
Size:  91.3 KB
    The 2013 pictured was the first year that had RES in all sizes. The year before was 191 only.

    Source - I own an RES pair of 186 from this season.

  21. #14721
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,199
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    Not quite true, Mr Bandit, AFAIK.

    2011/2012 was the first BG to include RES, but only in the 191cm length.

    2012/2013 had a refined RES and in all lengths. That's the bearclaw/manpaw graphic. 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 were the same build. I think 15/16, too, except that's when the 2cm of tail was whacked to make the lineup 189/184/179/174/164.

    2016/2017 saw a change to the sidecut to include short straight sections and I think they got a little stiffer. Starting to depart from the magickz.

    2017/2018 introduced asymmetrical taper to tips and tails.
    Yeah...you are right. Appreciate the correction.

    Funny how we all love that ski from over 10 years ago, were told why that ski needed to be changed to have a broader appeal, and now the compelling evidence to try the current evolution is that original benchmark.

    Regardless, I've skied my 186 2014's twice this week and have been loving them. I suppose clinging to the nostalgia of yesterday isn't always a bad thing.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  22. #14722
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    10,009
    Curious as to how the new goat stacks up to the last 187 which in my eyes was dialed and fixed any issue I ever had with the goats. Esp the new 191.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  23. #14723
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,325
    the previous 182s were pretty damn good as well, if not as good as my 2017 pre-asyms. The new version does admittedly sound dialed though. Can't wait to see the new BG118tours

  24. #14724
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,134
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    Not quite true, Mr Bandit, AFAIK.

    2011/2012 was the first BG to include RES, but only in the 191cm length.

    2012/2013 had a refined RES and in all lengths. That's the bearclaw/manpaw graphic. 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 were the same build. I think 15/16, too, except that's when the 2cm of tail was whacked to make the lineup 189/184/179/174/164.

    2016/2017 saw a change to the sidecut to include short straight sections and I think they got a little stiffer. Starting to depart from the magickz.

    2017/2018 introduced asymmetrical taper to tips and tails.
    I want to say all of this is correct. But I get a little fuzzy in where the asym changeover happened.

    2012/13 RES was also decently refined from the first iteration 191 in 2011/12. The Billy Goat was only 186 in 2008/09 (Tacoma build) and 186, 176 in 2009/10 and 2010/11. Might have been a 166 in there too.

    I still think a lot of the nostalgia for skis from 2012-2014 (across all brands) has more to do with that kinda being the culmination of a decade of radical ski shape design from the early 2000s through width, rocker and side cuts. 2012-2014 is when most brands had gone through a couple iterations of rocker taper design and feed back. Skis were also done just getting wider with more rocker. Since that time ski designs, especially shape, has somewhat stalled out.

  25. #14725
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Posts
    213
    Keep the new BG beta coming!

    My main 186 bear paws just died and I've only got one back-up pair left... I need the new 186 to hit the mark otherwise I'm fucked when my last pair of bearpaws cacks out.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •