Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: day trip ski tour pack size?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    562

    day trip ski tour pack size?

    I have been using a "DAKINE Heli Pro 20L Winter Pack - 1200cu in". It is just barley big enough.
    I like using the wet side pocket for my skins. The main compartment barley fits my mid-layer and jacket when skinning up - with everything else (food, safety stuff, water).

    Can't find a good place for the shovel or probe. I've got them to work, but it is always awkward. I attached some bungee cord and 550 line to make a harness for the shovel.

    Is 20L just too small for day tours?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    2,768
    yes

    35 at least especially if you ski where is gets cold
    I don't work and I don't save, desperate women pay my way.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Aspen, Colorado
    Posts
    2,644
    I'd say 32 to 40 liters is a good size for an average sized guy. I have a 40L avalung pack, which works well for me but I am a sloppy pack packer and I am a big guy.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,510
    Quote Originally Posted by Socialist View Post
    I attached some bungee cord and 550 line to make a harness for the shovel. Is 20L just too small for day tours?
    You're tying your shovel on with a bungee cord? I think you answered your own question.

    With a 30 liter pack, I can just barely get the following inside (really inside): mid-weight puffy, super compressible shell, extra gloves/hat, goggles, ski crampons, liter of water and sometimes a thermos, skins, some food, first aid/repair stuff, shovel/probe. I don't want to leave any of those behind.

    Anything smaller is just for lift skiing on high-avy days when just a shovel/probe/water goes inside.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ventura Highway in the Sunshine
    Posts
    22,445
    A well designed 22L packed efficiently works fine. Bigger is better especially if you just want to throw shit in.

    I agree it is a constitutional right for Americans to be assholes...its just too bad that so many take the opportunity...
    iscariot

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North Van
    Posts
    3,818
    My 22L BD Covert seems to fit pretty well what I'd bring on a day tour in Coastal BC. In the outside pocket, I keep my probe, shovel and skins. In the main pocket I have a Montbell micropuff type jacket in a small stuff sack, 2L of water (either in bottles or Camebak if it's warm enough), food, goggles, gloves, some first aid stuff though nothing very bulky (just some bandages, gauze, etc.) and room for both my shell and fleece if I need to take them off. It is a tight fit, though and having something around 30L would definitely give more room to work with, especially on colder days where I'd be wanting to bring more extra clothing. The good thing about a smaller pack, though, is that if forces you to pack efficiently.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Vallee Teton
    Posts
    2,729
    I find my 32L BD Covert gives me the flexibility to carry some extra stuff for a day tour.
    I had the 22L, but I didn't like the limitations of the smaller volume.

    I have shovel and probe in the outer pocket (suprised you can get skins in there D(c))
    Aggressive in my own mind

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North Van
    Posts
    3,818
    Quote Originally Posted by hoarhey View Post
    (suprised you can get skins in there D(c))
    They fit in there if I put them in individually without the skin bag - not having the bag or skin savers, etc. saves fiddling anyway. They're also Glidelights so I'm not sure if a thicker skin like an Ascension would go, but I have no issue getting them in there like that.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Vallee Teton
    Posts
    2,729
    that makes sense
    Aggressive in my own mind

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Whistler, BC
    Posts
    1,526
    My 20l BD agent pack can take....water/food, shovel, probe, crampons, skins, axe(outside), spare gloves, SMALL repair/first aids kit, synthetic layer, goggles, 30m rope and crevasse gear(hung on the bottom of shoulder straps for when I need it!).....AWESOME little pack.

    35l is good for longer days when you need more gear....longer rope etc...

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    13,446
    My BD outlaw 32L is perfect all around. I can use it for quick sidecountry jaunts with just avy gear and it's low profile enough to ride the lift without taking it off. It is also perfect for longer day tours. Along with avy gear I have carried skins, down layer, goggles, gloves, first aid, crampons, ice axe (outside), camera, cornice cutter, and full water bladder and had room to spare. It's also my everyday pack, for anything more I have a 45L pack.

    IMHO you want something in the 30's at least. Small packs are nice for sidecountry but if you want to get further out you shouldn't let you pack size determine what you can/cannot bring.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    736
    35liters is the perfect size. Can cover anything you might need to do in a day, and with some careful packing and thoughtful gear selection, could even work for an overnight.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    2 hours from anything
    Posts
    11,039
    35L with good cinch straps. Smaller packs waist strap never seems to get down to the top of the pelvis and are less comfortable than the 35L when skiing. Even if I have only 20L of gear, I would rather have it in a long thin package than a stuffed backpack.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,441
    I've used a Life Link Granite 15l quite successfully in the past without the dangling outerwear and shovels and shitshow all the place that appears to be in the vogue for backcountry travelling these days. Minimal stuff though - small puffy, skins, shovel, probe, saw, one water bottle, food and tiny first aid kit - basic slackcountry.

    Osprey Variant 28l pack review

    Black hole packs fit more stuff than packs with different compartments but that's skier preference.




  15. #15
    Hugh Conway Guest
    Except for the helmet and cloths worn, everything in the picture went inside the 32L Covert:


    edit: as well as the dSLR that took the pic.

    you could easily go less than 30L with some care. Amazing how much useless crap people carry in 40L packs

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    7B Idaho
    Posts
    1,044
    I use two packs depending on the day. Cold or variable weather, long tour, etc and I bring my "large pack" DaKine Poacher 45L.

    Day trips or anytime I know I can run light and I bring my K2 Pilchuck 35L pack. With compression straps I can scrunch it down to be very slim against my back. Fits my DSLR and gear without ever being bulky. Can still A-frame my skis securely.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    7B Idaho
    Posts
    1,044
    Canwilf: I previously had a DaKine Blade from around ~2005 that was around that size and fit me well @ 6'3" -- it was tall and slender. My current DaKine Poacher is similarly tall and slender but is bigger @ 45L (I upgraded for more room). You might try some of the brands/packs that have different sizes like Osprey (although not sure all of their ski-specific packs come in multiple sizes).

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    really? You can't guess it?
    Posts
    703
    I'm looking for ~30L backcountry pack rec's. The last real thread I could find was from 2009. I've looked at a couple so far, but would like some solid maggot imput and any other suggestions. I'm 6'2, 185 and I'm looking for a bag with a solid diagonal ski carry.

    Packs I've looked at:

    Dakine Tactic - looks really nice, does having the diagonal ski carry attach to the outer pocket cause the bag to slump?
    BD Covert - sloppy diagonal ski carry?
    Marmot Backcountry - seemed bulky and kind of sloppy

    Cheers
    Last edited by powtario; 05-04-2011 at 07:38 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by iceman View Post
    This is kinda like the goose that laid the golden egg, but shittier.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    7,450
    ^^^ gregory targhee - great ski carry system.
    In search of the elusive artic powder weasel ...

  20. #20
    Hugh Conway Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by powtario View Post
    BD Covert - sloppy diagonal ski carry?
    decent enough on the older model. Great all around ski pack ime.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    33,595
    I think its a bora 40L arcterxy I use for touring ,also good to overload for a weekend backpack BUT kind of fucking heavy ...I might look around for a lighter si pack

    for the hill I have a dakine apex which is really a bike pack or an old 28liter MEC which is a good size but the pack is getting a little done

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •