Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 38
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    869

    WWMD: Which New Powder Ski?

    I want a pair of reverse-camber powder skis bad. But which ones? The local shop has a few ARGs coming in, plus plenty of Pontoons. I've put down a deposit, so I get my choice. So, options: ARGs, Pontoons, use my deposit for something else and order Lotus something from DP?

    No way can I demo the ARGs-I don't think the two pair headed for the shop will last all that long. I read all the applicable threads, including:
    ARGs
    Pontoons
    DP 120s
    The shop owner skied the Pontoons last winter so he's pushing them over the ARGs. Not so many people have skied multiple different Spat-ish shapes.

    Specifics- I'm in Seattle and I tour locally, but ski lift-served mostly at Whistler. 5' 11" and 170#. I don't ski all that fast by maggot standards.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Southside of heaven
    Posts
    3,233
    I hear Praxis skis are SICK nasty.
    http://tetongravity.com/forums/showt...ghlight=praxis
    http://tetongravity.com/forums/showt...ghlight=praxis

    There is a little bit of info on them I think.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    6,383
    DP 120s. Fo shooooo.
    Drive slow, homie.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    ak
    Posts
    129
    how much are they selling the ARG's for? just curious. best of luck. i'm weighing the same options...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ootarded
    Posts
    4,058
    Dude. You know you want the Lotus. Too bad you don't tele or you'd know how they ski by now.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Anchorage, AK
    Posts
    303
    I want a pair of ARGs so bad...I hear they are amazingly light for the size they are and the ski that you get. And the sidecut underfoot sounds like a nice feature for getting back to the lifts. I'd wait 'till they come in and check them side-by-side, hand flex them (for what it's worth) and decide from there.
    ON3P
    _____________________________________________
    "Nothing is impossible. You are only limited by fear and even that you can overcome."
    -Seth Morrison
    _____________________________________________
    "a simple equation:

    force of impact + force of steeze = 0

    the two negate each other. for Eric, stomping a 60 ft cornice switch is like jumping on a really soft hotel mattress." - NS member ChronicF explaining why Eric Pollard still has knees.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    869
    Shop wouldn't go below list = $800 on the ARGs. Probably could get a deal on Pontoons but not ARGs. Good for you if you're getting hookups for a ski with an initial run of 40 pairs. I guess that puts ARGs within $100 of Lotus 120s via Marshall.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    1,107
    ARGs are supposedly more versitile than Pontoons. Great in the deep stuff (as are pontoons) and also great in the cut up stuff, similar to spats and 138s. Plus the huge tips slap together. I cancelled the order on my pontoons and am getting ARGs. Unfortunately I won't be able to give my own review for about another week or two.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ootarded
    Posts
    4,058
    Waitaminnit - now that I think of it didn't you already ski on the Tablas in CH? I know you didn't like the Surreals especially with the problems you were having with those naxos, but I can't remember if the version 2 Tablas were there as well. That guy Bjorn was on them, but was there a pair mounted with AT bindings too?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    sandy, sl,ut
    Posts
    9,389
    Don't forget the 4frnt EHP 193s, and the Salomon reverse camber somethings that are supposed to come out sometime, someday.

    And why the DP 120s, as opposed to the 130s? It seems like if you're going that far, just go all the way.
    __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ________________
    "We don't need predator control, we need whiner control. Anyone who complains that "the gummint oughta do sumpin" about the wolves and coyotes should be darted, caged, and released in a more suitable habitat for them, like the middle of Manhattan." - Spats

    "I'm constantly doing things I can't do. Thats how I get to do them." - Pablo Picasso

    Cisco and his wife are fragile idiots who breed morons.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,083
    Between those three....

    lotus, then ARG, then pontoon.

    EHP would be sick, as would an igneous FFF
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    869
    Quote Originally Posted by Tri-Ungulate View Post
    Waitaminnit - now that I think of it didn't you already ski on the Tablas in CH? I know you didn't like the Surreals especially with the problems you were having with those naxos, but I can't remember if the version 2 Tablas were there as well. That guy Bjorn was on them, but was there a pair mounted with AT bindings too?
    I never rode the Tablas. After the factory-tuned Surreals tossed me off that cat track , I was sticking with my R:Exs.

    As an early season purchase, the EHP 193s are not happening. Plus I shop-flexed the 190s and they are reasonably stiff. If the 193s are significantly stiffer, then they're stiffer than I need for powder skiing.

    I think ARGs... The topsheet is cooler than the Pontoon, anyway.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northshore
    Posts
    415
    ARG's fo Shizzle.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    2,314
    Quote Originally Posted by skinnyskier View Post
    The topsheet is cooler than the Pontoon, anyway.
    You can never go wrong picking skis based on graphics
    "I dont hike.... my legs are too heavy"

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Alpine Meadows
    Posts
    16

    Praxis skis are for REAL!!!!

    I skied a pair of the praxis prototypes last season and I was highly impressed...so impressed that I purchased a pair this season!!!! They put the Spatula's to shame....if the spatula's were a car they'd be a doge Viper....fast, heavy and no handling....the Praxis would be a Carrera GT; super fast, stable, light, turn on a dime or you can point em straight down the mountain @ downhill speeds and be super stable!!!!! They are much easier to handle in non-powder and groomer situations than the spatula's as well!!! In my opinion you cannot purchase a better pow ski, I highly suggest looking into a pair....There is info on this site if you wanna pair....I do believe they are selling real quick too!!!!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    16
    I agree Praxis is by far the best constructed and thought out design this year

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,465
    Quote Originally Posted by Jasonskis420 View Post
    I agree Praxis is by far the best constructed and thought out design this year
    ha ha ha ha. nice blanket statement.

    anyhow,

    praxis: most bang for the buck
    pontoon: ...meh...
    EHP: prolly more ski than you need if you are not a super fast skier.
    ARG: might as well just get praxis - its the same ski, better made, for less money.
    lotus: you have read my reviews. they rock.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    6,051
    Quote Originally Posted by marshalolson View Post
    ha ha ha ha. nice blanket statement.

    anyhow,

    praxis: most bang for the buck
    pontoon: ...meh...
    EHP: prolly more ski than you need if you are not a super fast skier.
    ARG: might as well just get praxis - its the same ski, better made, for less money.
    lotus: you have read my reviews. they rock.
    Marsh, was I wrong in thinking the praxis had no sidecut underfoot? Doesn't the ARG have a little somethin somethin to get you back to the lifts/traverse?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Jackson
    Posts
    1,537
    $800 for ARG's or just a bit more for some DP's?


    Shouldn't even be a contest. Get yourself some 120's or 138's.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,465
    Quote Originally Posted by XtrPickels View Post
    Marsh, was I wrong in thinking the praxis had no sidecut underfoot? Doesn't the ARG have a little somethin somethin to get you back to the lifts/traverse?
    i can't remember if the ARG is flat or not, but a little flat under foot with rocker will help traversing, but i really don't think that 1-2mm of sidecut is going to do shit traversing. the reason spats traversed out like shit was b/c the weighed 1000lbs.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Upland, CA
    Posts
    5,572
    What's with the pontoon hate? Who here has skied it? What makes the ARG so much better, besides Tanner and all the Armada hype? I skied mine yesterday and had a fucking blast. No tip-slap problems, and they didn't delam.

    And if you really, really look at it, the Pontoon and the ARG are pretty much the same thing - the 'toon is not a strict pintail shape, but rather has a moderate sidecut just like the ARG. Look at it - it tapers underfoot, and widens again to the bottom floatplane, and then tapers back to the tail. The big difference is that the ARG gets narrower towards the tip, and the Pontoon doesn't.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    The bottom of LCC
    Posts
    5,750
    If I still lived somewhere that it snowed I would've bought the praxis by now. I'm a sucker for a good deal.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Jackson
    Posts
    1,537
    Quote Originally Posted by marshalolson View Post
    the reason spats traversed out like shit was b/c the weighed 1000lbs.
    Your use of the past tense is confusing to me.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    16
    The reason the spat traversed like shit was because it was weighted poorly, now all these new skis have improved on the traversing by just equaling the weight out on the tips and tails, except the pontoon that has huge heavy tips and light tails.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Snowmasspen
    Posts
    1,225
    Quote Originally Posted by Jumper Bones View Post
    No tip-slap problems, and they didn't delam.
    Don't worry, just give it a few more days.

    I am sure they are super fun, but they just are not as pivotalicious as the true reverse/reverse shape skis. IMHO pontoons vs. (Spat, Praxis, Arg) are two different ways to look at pow skis.

    Pontoons = skidalicious
    Spatula & friends = pivotalicious with skidalicious on the side

Similar Threads

  1. Paedde’s US Snow Safari 2006 – Trip Report and Pics
    By paedde in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 144
    Last Post: 07-24-2006, 03:03 AM
  2. Volkl Gotama: The Euro Powder Ski?
    By Alpinist in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 04-10-2006, 04:17 PM
  3. PNW Crybabies
    By Rusty Nails in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 01-21-2005, 10:26 PM
  4. Powder Video Award Nominees
    By watersnowdirt in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-12-2005, 10:35 AM
  5. TRIP REPORT: POWDER VIDEO AWARDS! (/w PICS!)
    By Summit in forum TGR Forum Archives
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 05-04-2004, 01:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •