Results 51 to 75 of 209
Thread: San Francisco plane crash
-
07-07-2013, 12:39 PM #51
Ahhh yes, I see that the PAPI NOTAM was added after the crash. So the crew basically had two other means of vertical guidance, plus their eyes of course.
Just curious, what certificates/ratings do you hold?
This was posted on another forum (not me):
I flew for these guys for several years. Whilst the facts are not known and it could be anything at this stage, I will say that the majority of the Korean Pilots were lost without the G/S. Also, most of them had[have] a tendency to push forward and undershoot the Glide Slope in the last couple hundred feet in order to have a lower angle in the hope of the "smooth landing. These guys were obsessed with the smooth landing. Word got around about me, and when they flew with me they knew never to undershoot when I was next to them.
-
07-07-2013, 12:46 PM #52
-
07-07-2013, 01:01 PM #53Hugh Conway Guest
generalize? Korean Airlines had to retool their training to fit "Korean Culture" after a string of accidents.
-
07-07-2013, 01:03 PM #54
Just here to say SFO is a junkshow today! Between the BART strike and this my travels in the Bay area have been, unique.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using TGR Forums`•.¸¸.•´><((((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸.? ??´¯`•...¸><((((º>
"Having been Baptized by uller his frosty air now burns my soul with confirmation. I am once again pure." - frozenwater
"once i let go of my material desires many opportunities for playing with the planet emerge. emerge - to come into being through evolution. ok back to work - i gotta pack." - Slaag Master
"As for Flock of Seagulls, everytime that song comes up on my ipod, I turn it up- way up." - goldenboy
-
07-07-2013, 01:04 PM #55
i have had some pretty terrible landings in the past few years. Rocking back and forth, super hard landings, airborne after landing then back down.
Is pilot training changing? Lots of new grads? Less military grade?Terje was right.
"We're all kooks to somebody else." -Shelby Menzel
-
07-07-2013, 01:23 PM #56Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 9,002
-
07-07-2013, 01:51 PM #57
-
07-07-2013, 02:27 PM #58spook Guest
-
07-07-2013, 03:09 PM #59Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 9,002
-
07-07-2013, 03:15 PM #60spook Guest
i think the real problem is that neither of you know what "know" means
-
07-07-2013, 03:19 PM #61
-
07-07-2013, 03:24 PM #62spook Guest
before i read the story and only saw the top of the plane burned open i assumed they were all. um. anything but rice krispies.
-
07-07-2013, 03:31 PM #63
-
07-07-2013, 03:37 PM #64
Yes. There is a highly detailed chapter regarding oriental cultural issues and flying in the book The Outliers. It's a huge problem, and the reason that a perfectly good Korean Air Lines 747 crashed on Guam 15 or so years ago.
The gist of the cultural issue is that oriental flight crews -generally speaking- look at their Captains as being far superior both socially and professionally. If the captain is screwing up, the rest of the crew feels that it's inappropriate to "chastise" him.
In Western cultures this is not a problem. We feel comfortable saying "Dude, what are you doing!" And the person screwing up always appreciates the input. 'Cause you know, it's better than a plane crash.
An enormous amount of effort has gone into training oriental flight crews, but there's an enormous hurdle in overcoming several thousand years of cultural stigmas. Oriental airlines realize this, and would prefer to have western crews in their cockpits.
That being said, the SFO wreck could have mechanical elements involved and not be the result of pilot error. We'll have to wait and see. It's pretty hard to see how someone could blow a visual approach that badly, especially with an RNAV backup.
-
07-07-2013, 03:39 PM #65
From cnn video, it looked like it cartwheeled!
Only reason I can think that anyone walked away form that was that the fuel tanks were near empty.
-
07-07-2013, 03:40 PM #66Funky But Chic
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- The Cone of Uncertainty
- Posts
- 49,306
-
07-07-2013, 03:47 PM #67
The TV keeps saying this but I want to point out that they would likely have had somewhere between 7,000 to 10,000lbs of fuel remaining in the tanks, or more. It was just lucky the engines separated and nothing punctured the tanks.
The video is incredible. ATC initially told us they had cartwheeled down the runway and now I see why.I thought their offices would be strewn with bunny-fucking and condom dispensers, a veritable enchanted forest of cock shafts and twat mist. - JoeStrummer
-
07-07-2013, 04:10 PM #68
-
07-07-2013, 04:16 PM #69`•.¸¸.•´><((((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸.? ??´¯`•...¸><((((º>
"Having been Baptized by uller his frosty air now burns my soul with confirmation. I am once again pure." - frozenwater
"once i let go of my material desires many opportunities for playing with the planet emerge. emerge - to come into being through evolution. ok back to work - i gotta pack." - Slaag Master
"As for Flock of Seagulls, everytime that song comes up on my ipod, I turn it up- way up." - goldenboy
-
07-07-2013, 04:20 PM #70
-
07-07-2013, 04:24 PM #71
-
07-07-2013, 04:49 PM #72Hugh Conway Guest
-
07-07-2013, 04:49 PM #73spook Guest
-
07-07-2013, 04:59 PM #74
Not luck at all. The airplanes are designed for that. Fuse pins at the engine mounts that shear when the airplane hits something.
The reason this was just a very wild ride for the majority of the passengers on this airplane has a lot more to do with engineering than luck.
-
07-07-2013, 06:24 PM #75Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Splat's Garage
- Posts
- 4,207
Bookmarks